Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fodor's avatar

This resonates! Especially when you wrote: …’being thrown on the bed. It can be seen as passion, for me it’s about impatience’

My theory is that the worst male M/M erotica writers default to insta-porn-a-penetration because, well, uh, we are partially wired that way, arousal-wise. That’s why men consume so much porn irl. Takes time, discipline and skill to lead our characters into a unique, literary, believably pleasant, lubricated - yet red hot - experience!

Violence and bodice ripping substitute for real connection in W/M pulp erotica. Rapid penetration porn is the substitute in M/M.

I’m exhausted from substack scrolling through stuff labelled erotica that is actually porn. I understand that it sells. I just wish it was differentiated so I could choose! Any ideas for a label?

Arden Tomas™ 🏳️‍🌈's avatar

Demi, this piece is everything. ❤️

You put into words something I've felt for so long but never knew how to articulate. The way you describe the difference — the jelenlét (presence), the síkosító, the slow building — that's exactly what makes M/M erotika so powerful. It's not just about the act. It's about the connection. The way two men have to work together, communicate, pay attention to every reaction.

And that line: "The bypassing of building the pleasure" — that's the root of so much bad sex and bad erotika. The assumption that the body is ready, that the pleasure can be rushed, that the goal is the orgasm and not the journey.

Thank you for writing this. And thank you for mentioning me among those writers. I'm honored to be in that company. 🔥

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?